<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>blogging...</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gdambra.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gdambra.com</link>
	<description>All right, brain, you don't like me, and I don't like you, but let's just get me through this, and I can get back to killing you with beer. - H.J. Simpson</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s probably easier to raise $5 million in funding than it is $500,000.</title>
		<link>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/11/17/its-probably-easier-to-raise-5-million-in-funding-than-it-is-500000/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/11/17/its-probably-easier-to-raise-5-million-in-funding-than-it-is-500000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GP</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[VC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gdambra.com/?p=234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s not what you&#8217;d expect. I would have guessed difficulty in raising funds would be linear, but it isn&#8217;t.
The primary reason is that there are two typical investors: angels and VCs. Angels are just wealthy people who typically sums of between $10 and $100k, with $50k probably being a good average.
VCs are institutional investors who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not what you&#8217;d expect. I would have guessed difficulty in raising funds would be linear, but it isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>The primary reason is that there are two typical investors: angels and VCs. Angels are just wealthy people who typically sums of between $10 and $100k, with $50k probably being a good average.</p>
<p>VCs are institutional investors who raise funds often totaling in the hundreds of millions, and are paid in such a way that they are incentivized to deploy the entire amount into investments. So, VCs like to make bigger investments because then they can make fewer. That means less due diligence, fewer board meetings, etc.</p>
<p>Not many VCs make it their business to invest amounts of money that small. It happens, but it&#8217;s often just something they do to lock up right of first refusal on future rounds. A lot of companies would much rather raise $500k than $5m, so they&#8217;ll do it if they like you enough, but it&#8217;s relatively uncommon.</p>
<p>Raising $500k from angels means convincing somewhere between 5 and 20 different people, all with their own habits and goals, to invest in you at the same valuation and terms. That happens too actually, even outside of the few syndicates that exist, but again, it&#8217;s hard to pull off.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter" title="Raising funds" src="http://mattmaroon.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/image-thumb.png" alt="" width="447" height="285" /></p>
<p><a href="http://mattmaroon.com/?p=604" target="_blank">Full Article </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/11/17/its-probably-easier-to-raise-5-million-in-funding-than-it-is-500000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Denmark more linked to silicon Valley, Google Chrome&#8217;s danish heart</title>
		<link>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/11/13/denmark-more-linked-to-silicon-valley-google-chromes-danish-heart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/11/13/denmark-more-linked-to-silicon-valley-google-chromes-danish-heart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GP</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Me]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gdambra.com/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Danish farm nestled just a bike ride away from Aarhus—a small city founded 1,000 years ago by Vikings—is a long way from traffic-clogged Silicon Valley and its high-energy engineers and entrepreneurs. Yet it was here that work began on the engine that powers the new Chrome Web browser from Google (GOOG), a product that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="null"><img class="alignleft" title="Google Chrome" src="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2008/09/chrome21.jpg" alt="" width="200" /></a>A Danish farm nestled just a bike ride away from Aarhus—a small city founded 1,000 years ago by Vikings—is a long way from traffic-clogged Silicon Valley and its high-energy engineers and entrepreneurs. Yet it was here that work began on the engine that powers the new Chrome Web browser from Google (<a href="http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?symbol=GOOG">GOOG</a>), a product that aims to change the very nature of Internet browsing and the way we use computers.</p>
<p>Traditional browsers such as Internet Explorer from Microsoft (<a href="http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?symbol=MSFT">MSFT</a>) and Firefox from <a href="http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?capId=10460890">Mozilla</a> are designed primarily to display Web pages accessed from remote servers. But thanks to the Java language from Sun Microsystems (<a href="http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?symbol=JAVA">JAVA</a>), there are now a growing number of full-fledged software applications available via the Net—and browsers are increasingly assuming responsibility for running them.</p>
<p><a href="null"><img style="float:right;" title="Denmark Flag" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/25/Nyhavn-Copenhagen-Denmark-flag.jpg/400px-Nyhavn-Copenhagen-Denmark-flag.jpg" alt="" width="150" /></a>When Google dreamed up Chrome, its aim was to create a browser capable of running those applications dramatically faster than <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/sep2008/tc2008092_293242.htm">any previous alternative</a> (BusinessWeek.com, 9/3/08). If the product succeeds as planned, it could upend the traditional computing model—typified by Microsoft Windows and Office—where software loads and runs locally on a PC, replacing it instead with an approach known as &#8220;cloud computing,&#8221; where programs run over the Internet.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s where the Danish farmhouse comes in. Its occupant, Lars Bak, is one of the world&#8217;s foremost experts in JavaScript engines—programs that run Java code on a variety of local computers. A slim, 45-year-old Danish computer scientist with close-cropped hair, Bak has spent the last two decades working on so-called &#8220;virtual machines&#8221; that, like the JavaScript engine in Chrome, execute one program inside another. He holds 18 U.S. patents in the field and spent seven years at Sun, where he developed a high-performance virtual machine that is still used by Sun, Apple (<a href="http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?symbol=AAPL">AAPL</a>), and Hewlett-Packard (<a href="http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?symbol=HPQ">HPQ</a>).</p>
<p>Bak had moved back to Denmark in 2000 so that his two daughters, now 13 and 15, could be educated in his native country. Two years later he left Sun to start a new company with a pair of students from Aarhus University, called OOVM, that was bought in 2004 by Switzerland&#8217;s Esmertec (<a href="http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?symbol=ESMN.F">ESMN.F</a>). After a two-year stint as chief architect and engineering manager for Esmertec, which specializes in Java software for mobile phones, Bak was ready for a break.</p>
<p>Two weeks later, he got a call from Google asking him to work on Chrome. Bak says he was intrigued by the project because &#8220;the goal was to raise the bar for the whole industry.&#8221; But he and his family didn&#8217;t want to leave the 1860 farmhouse on eight acres of land near Aarhus where they live. Google agreed to hire him anyway—and Bak set up shop in an old stable on the property and began hiring local talent.</p>
<p>The engineering team soon outgrew the stable and moved to office space at Aarhus University. There, Bak and a dozen other engineers worked in stealth mode to build a new JavaScript engine for Chrome, code-named V8, that was based on open-source software and designed from the ground up for speedy performance.</p>
<p>&#8220;Lars&#8217; experience in this area made him the ideal person to work on this ambitious, significant project,&#8221; says <a href="http://investing.businessweek.com/businessweek/research/stocks/people/person.asp?personId=21751034&amp;symbol=GOOG"><span style="color: #007cd5;">Nelson Mattos</span></a>, Google&#8217;s vice-president of engineering for Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. &#8220;V8 is the key to Chrome&#8217;s remarkable speed, and because it&#8217;s open source, it&#8217;s also a contribution to browser technology in general.&#8221;</p>
<p>Experts agree that the speed of the engine that Bak and his team designed is one of Chrome&#8217;s key differentiators. In the short term, according to tech consultancy Gartner (<a href="http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?symbol=IT"><span style="color: #007cd5;">IT</span></a>), the new browser&#8217;s success will be measured by whether it delivers a superior user experience for JavaScript-intensive applications, such as Google&#8217;s Gmail. But the ultimate test is whether Chrome&#8217;s appeal will extend beyond early adopters to mainstream enterprise customers—a chasm that other challengers such as Firefox and Apple&#8217;s Safari haven&#8217;t yet crossed in dominant numbers.</p>
<p>One thing is for sure. Chrome is expected to achieve what Bak set out to do: raise the bar for the whole industry. Press reports have estimated Chrome to be as much as 56 times faster than Internet Explorer at running Java programs. Bak is cagey about Chrome&#8217;s performance compared with rivals because it depends on which benchmarks are used. Plus, competing browsers are also evolving rapidly; indeed, some reports already claim that a new JavaScript engine in Firefox outperforms V8. &#8220;Competitors will catch up,&#8221; says Sheri McLeish, an analyst at technology consultancy Forrester Research (<a href="http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?symbol=FORR"><span style="color: #007cd5;">FORR</span></a>). &#8220;Whenever there are new entrants it ups the ante.&#8221;</p>
<p>As for Bak, he is still at work in Denmark, continuing to tinker with Chrome&#8217;s engine to make it better. The office at Aarhus University doesn&#8217;t offer any of the perks that Google is famous for, such as free haircuts and gourmet meals. But living in the Danish countryside and commuting on his bike to a job with one of Silicon Valley&#8217;s most successful companies is all the reward he needs, Bak says. That, and potentially changing the whole way people use computers and the Internet.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/nov2008/gb20081112_082312.htm">Busienss Week original article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/11/13/denmark-more-linked-to-silicon-valley-google-chromes-danish-heart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Se la parola &#8220;abbronzato&#8221; è più pericolosa di &#8220;negro&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/11/07/se-la-parola-abbronzato-e-piu-pericolosa-di-negro/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/11/07/se-la-parola-abbronzato-e-piu-pericolosa-di-negro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GP</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Me]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gdambra.com/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]
Quel che si nega quando, riferendosi al neoeletto presidente americano, lo si definisce abbronzato. Qui il nemico non è l&#8217;offesa patente alla dignità della persona ma un razzismo subdolo e insinuante. Un nemico, è in un certo senso, interno.
Pericoloso quanto quello esterno, visibile e affrontabile.
Se non di più.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]</p>
<div>Quel che si nega quando, riferendosi al neoeletto presidente americano, lo si definisce abbronzato. Qui il nemico non è l&#8217;offesa patente alla dignità della persona ma un razzismo subdolo e insinuante. Un nemico, è in un certo senso, interno.<br />
Pericoloso quanto quello esterno, visibile e affrontabile.</p>
<p>Se non di più.</p></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/11/07/se-la-parola-abbronzato-e-piu-pericolosa-di-negro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Something is changing&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/11/06/something-is-changing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/11/06/something-is-changing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GP</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Life Style]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gdambra.com/2008/11/06/something-is-changing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter" title="Barak Obama" src="http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2008/04/03/wOBAMA_wideweb__470x347,0.jpg" alt="" width="470" height="347" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/11/06/something-is-changing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nine Web 2.0 Startups Beating The Odds in Down Economy</title>
		<link>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/11/06/nine-web-20-startups-beating-the-odds-in-down-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/11/06/nine-web-20-startups-beating-the-odds-in-down-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 08:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GP</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Me]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gdambra.com/?p=220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funded with $50,000 or less, here&#8217;s how nine Web 2.0 companies are making their products work in the worst of times.
http://www.cio.com/article/460014/Nine_Web_._Startups_Beating_The_Odds_in_Down_Economy_?page=1
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funded with $50,000 or less, here&#8217;s how nine Web 2.0 companies are making their products work in the worst of times.</p>
<p><a href="Nine Web 2.0 Startups Beating The Odds in Down Economy Funded with $50,000 or less, here's how nine Web 2.0 companies are making their products work in the worst of times. http://www.cio.com/article/460014/Nine_Web_._Startups_Beating_The_Odds_in_Down_Economy_?page=1">http://www.cio.com/article/460014/Nine_Web_._Startups_Beating_The_Odds_in_Down_Economy_?page=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/11/06/nine-web-20-startups-beating-the-odds-in-down-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why to start a startup in a bad economy</title>
		<link>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/10/23/why-to-start-a-startup-in-a-bad-economy-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/10/23/why-to-start-a-startup-in-a-bad-economy-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GP</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[VC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gdambra.com/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a Paul graham Article:
 
The economic situation is apparently so grim that some experts fear we may be in for a stretch as bad as the mid seventies.
When Microsoft and Apple were founded.
As those examples suggest, a recession may not be such a bad time to start a startup. I&#8217;m not claiming it&#8217;s a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: Verdana;">This is a Paul graham Article:</span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: Verdana;"><em>The economic situation is apparently so grim that some experts fear we may be in for a stretch as bad as the mid seventies.</p>
<p>When Microsoft and Apple were founded.</p>
<p>As those examples suggest, a recession may not be such a bad time to start a startup. I&#8217;m not claiming it&#8217;s a particularly good time either. The truth is more boring: the state of the economy doesn&#8217;t matter much either way.</p>
<p>If we&#8217;ve learned one thing from funding so many startups, it&#8217;s that they succeed or fail based on the qualities of the founders. The economy has some effect, certainly, but as a predictor of success it&#8217;s rounding error compared to the founders.</p>
<p>Which means that what matters is who you are, not when you do it. If you&#8217;re the right sort of person, you&#8217;ll win even in a bad economy. And if you&#8217;re not, a good economy won&#8217;t save you. Someone who thinks &#8220;I better not start a startup now, because the economy is so bad&#8221; is making the same mistake as the people who thought during the Bubble &#8220;all I have to do is start a startup, and I&#8217;ll be rich.&#8221;</p>
<p>So if you want to improve your chances, you should think far more about who you can recruit as a cofounder than the state of the economy. And if you&#8217;re worried about threats to the survival of your company, don&#8217;t look for them in the news. Look in the mirror.</p>
<p>But for any given team of founders, would it not pay to wait till the economy is better before taking the leap? If you&#8217;re starting a restaurant, maybe, but not if you&#8217;re working on technology. Technology progresses more or less independently of the stock market. So for any given idea, the payoff for acting fast in a bad economy will be higher than for waiting. Microsoft&#8217;s first product was a Basic interpreter for the Altair. That was exactly what the world needed in 1975, but if Gates and Allen had decided to wait a few years, it would have been too late.<script></script> </p>
<p>Of course, the idea you have now won&#8217;t be the last you have. There are always new ideas. But if you have a specific idea you want to act on, act now.</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t mean you can ignore the economy. Both customers and investors will be feeling pinched. It&#8217;s not necessarily a problem if customers feel pinched: you may even be able to benefit from it, by making things that </em></span><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://bountii.com/" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: Verdana;"><em>save money</em></span></a><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: Verdana;"><em>. Startups often make things cheaper, so in that respect they&#8217;re better positioned to prosper in a recession than big companies.</p>
<p>Investors are more of a problem. Startups generally need to raise some amount of external funding, and investors tend to be less willing to invest in bad times. They shouldn&#8217;t be. Everyone knows you&#8217;re supposed to buy when times are bad and sell when times are good. But of course what makes investing so counterintuitive is that in equity markets, good times are defined as everyone thinking it&#8217;s time to buy. You have to be a contrarian to be correct, and by definition only a minority of investors can be.</p>
<p>So just as investors in 1999 were tripping over one another trying to buy into lousy startups, investors in 2009 will presumably be reluctant to invest even in good ones.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll have to adapt to this. But that&#8217;s nothing new: startups always have to adapt to the whims of investors. Ask any founder in any economy if they&#8217;d describe investors as fickle, and watch the face they make. Last year you had to be prepared to explain how your startup was viral. Next year you&#8217;ll have to explain how it&#8217;s recession-proof.</p>
<p>(Those are both good things to be. The mistake investors make is not the criteria they use but that they always tend to focus on one to the exclusion of the rest.)</p>
<p>Fortunately the way to make a startup recession-proof is to do exactly what you should do anyway: run it as cheaply as possible. For years I&#8217;ve been telling founders that the surest route to success is to be the cockroaches of the corporate world. The immediate cause of death in a startup is always running out of money. The cheaper your company is to operate, the harder it is to kill. Fortunately it has gotten very cheap to run a startup, and a recession will if anything make it cheaper still.<script></script></p>
<p>If nuclear winter really is here, it may be safer to be a cockroach even than to keep your job. Customers may drop off individually if they can no longer afford you, but you&#8217;re not going to lose them all at once; markets don&#8217;t &#8220;reduce headcount.&#8221;</p>
<p>What if you quit your job to start a startup that fails, and you can&#8217;t find another? That could be a problem if you work in sales or marketing. In those fields it can take months to find a new job in a bad economy. But hackers seem to be more liquid. Good hackers can always get some kind of job. It might not be your dream job, but you&#8217;re not going to starve.</p>
<p>Another advantage of bad times is that there&#8217;s less competition. Technology trains leave the station at regular intervals. If everyone else is cowering in a corner, you may have a whole car to yourself.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re an investor too. As a founder, you&#8217;re buying stock with work: the reason Larry and Sergey are so rich is not so much that they&#8217;ve done work worth tens of billions of dollars, but that they were the first investors in Google. And like any investor you should buy when times are bad.</p>
<p>Were you nodding in agreement, thinking &#8220;stupid investors&#8221; a few paragraphs ago when I was talking about how investors are reluctant to put money into startups in bad markets, even though that&#8217;s the time they should rationally be most willing to buy? Well, founders aren&#8217;t much better. When times get bad, hackers go to grad school. And no doubt that will happen this time too. In fact, what makes the preceding paragraph true is that most readers won&#8217;t believe it—at least to the extent of acting on it.</p>
<p>So maybe a recession is a good time to start a startup. It&#8217;s hard to say whether advantages like lack of competition outweigh disadvantages like reluctant investors. But it doesn&#8217;t matter much either way. It&#8217;s the people that matter. And for a given set of people working on a given technology, the time to act is always now.<script></script> </em></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/10/23/why-to-start-a-startup-in-a-bad-economy-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Gates&#8217; mysterious company</title>
		<link>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/10/23/bill-gates-mysterious-company/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/10/23/bill-gates-mysterious-company/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GP</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Me]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gdambra.com/?p=218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Content-Disposition: inline
Bill Gates created a company called bgc3. The records describe bgC3 as=
a &#8220;holding company&#8221; headquartered in Kirkland =96a relatively short, pictu=
resque drive from Gates&#8217; home on Lake Washington.
Federal trademark =
filings provide more clues =96 describing bgC3 as a think tank, under a gen=
eric trademark classification that corresponds broadly to areas including &#38;=
quot;scientific and technological [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Content-Disposition: inline</p>
<div>Bill Gates created a company called bgc3. The records describe bgC3 as=<br />
a &#8220;holding company&#8221; headquartered in Kirkland =96a relatively short, pictu=<br />
resque drive from Gates&#8217; home on Lake Washington.</p>
<p>Federal trademark =<br />
filings provide more clues =96 describing bgC3 as a think tank, under a gen=<br />
eric trademark classification that corresponds broadly to areas including &amp;=<br />
quot;scientific and technological services,&#8221; &#8220;industrial analysis=<br />
and research,&#8221; and &#8220;design and development of computer hardware =<br />
and software.&#8221;</p>
<p>But what does bgC3 mean? The logical assumption might be &#8220;Bill Gates Co=<br />
mpany Three&#8221; =96 his third enterprise after Microsoft and the Bill &amp; Me=<br />
linda Gates Foundation. But that&#8217;s only partially right, according to the G=<br />
ates insider.</p>
<p>The &#8220;bg&#8221; is Bill Gates, the insider says, but the &#8220;C&#8221; stands for &#8220;catal=<br />
yst.&#8221; The idea is that Gates will play that role as he brings together new =<br />
people and ideas. The &#8220;three&#8221; reflects the notion of a third place, apart f=<br />
rom Microsoft and the foundation.</p></div>
<div>What BG has in his cylinder?</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/10/23/bill-gates-mysterious-company/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hide your plan</title>
		<link>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/09/29/hide-your-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/09/29/hide-your-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GP</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Me]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gdambra.com/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filip Dierckx, the new CEO of Fortis Bank has been photographed after the negotiating of the Bank with Benelux countries. In the photo you could read all the details of the plan. Everybody knows them before of the announcement.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gdambra.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/fortis-bozza-reuters-1000.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-212" style="float:left;margin:5px;" title="FORTIS/" src="http://www.gdambra.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/fortis-bozza-reuters-1000-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Filip Dierckx, the new CEO of Fortis Bank has been photographed after the negotiating of the Bank with Benelux countries. In the photo you could read all the details of the plan. Everybody knows them before of the announcement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/09/29/hide-your-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iphone 2.1 update! fixing bugs!</title>
		<link>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/09/12/iphone-21-update-fixing-bugs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/09/12/iphone-21-update-fixing-bugs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GP</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gdambra.com/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really hope that apple will fix all the Iphone problems (3G connectivity, slow contact search, etc..) with this update:
http://www.apple.com/iphone/softwareupdate/
Update includes:



Decrease in call set-up failures and dropped calls
Significantly better battery life for most users
Dramatically reduced time to backup to iTunes
Improved email reliability, notably fetching email from POP and Exchange accounts
Faster installation of 3rd party applications
Fixed bugs causing hangs and crashes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope that apple will fix all the Iphone problems (3G connectivity, slow contact search, etc..) with this update:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/softwareupdate/">http://www.apple.com/iphone/softwareupdate/</a></p>
<p>Update includes:</p>
<div class="grid2col">
<div class="column first">
<ul class="square">
<li>Decrease in call set-up failures and dropped calls</li>
<li>Significantly better battery life for most users</li>
<li>Dramatically reduced time to backup to iTunes</li>
<li>Improved email reliability, notably fetching email from POP and Exchange accounts</li>
<li>Faster installation of 3rd party applications</li>
<li>Fixed bugs causing hangs and crashes for users with lots of third party applications</li>
<li>Improved performance in text messaging</li>
<li>Faster loading and searching of contacts</li>
<li>Improved accuracy of the 3G signal strength display</li>
<li>Repeat alert up to two additional times for incoming text messages</li>
<li>Option to wipe data after ten failed passcode attempts</li>
<li>Genius playlist creation</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/09/12/iphone-21-update-fixing-bugs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>20 best countries for startups - Denmark is 5th!</title>
		<link>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/09/11/20-best-countries-for-startups-denmark-is-5th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/09/11/20-best-countries-for-startups-denmark-is-5th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 22:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GP</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Me]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gdambra.com/?p=206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Reading this article, I&#8217;m not surprised to find Denmark at #5. This a little but amazing country!
Here the linked paragraphs:
2009 rank: #5
2008 rank: #5
Denmark is the only economy in the world where it costs nothing to start a business, although entrepreneurs do have to show that they have some money in the bank before they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="cnnslidePhoto" style="width: 340px;">
<p><!-- /cnnrelatedStories*** --></div>
<p>Reading this <a href="http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/smallbusiness/0809/gallery.best_countries_for_business.smb/index.html">article</a>, I&#8217;m not surprised to find Denmark at #5. This a little but amazing country!</p>
<p>Here the linked paragraphs:</p>
<p><em><strong>2009 rank:</strong> #5<br />
<strong>2008 rank:</strong> #5</em></p>
<p><em>Denmark is the only economy in the world where it costs nothing to start a business, although entrepreneurs do have to show that they have some money in the bank before they can set up shop. Registration requires only four procedures and takes just six days.</em></p>
<p><em><img class="alignright" style="margin: 10px;" src="http://i2.cdn.turner.com/money/galleries/2008/smallbusiness/0809/gallery.best_countries_for_business.smb/images/denmark_copenhagen.ce.jpg" alt="5. Denmark " width="340" height="255" /></em></p>
<p><em>With relatively strong legal rights for borrowers and lenders, laws that make it fairly easy to hire and fire employees, and some of the lowest export and import costs, this is the second year Denmark has the No. 5 position in the &#8220;Doing Business&#8221; ranking.</em></p>
<p><em>Danish reforms in 2007 and 2008 include a reduction in the corporate tax rate, which dropped from 28% to 25%, and changes to the court system to allow for some contract-enforcement cases to be sent to mediation.</em></p>
<p><em>Registering property, however, isn&#8217;t exactly speedy, with an average duration of 42 days, - and while applying for a construction permit may appear easy, requiring a world-record of just six procedures, it still takes a total of 69 days to process.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gdambra.com/2008/09/11/20-best-countries-for-startups-denmark-is-5th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
